ArticleBMC health services research2026
Barriers to long-term follow-up among patients in cardiovascular-metabolic clinics: a qualitative study based on the COM-B model.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiometabolic diseases are major chronic conditions requiring long-term follow-up to optimize management and prevent complications, yet discontinuation of follow-up is common and may compromise patient outcomes. Evidence on the specific barriers to sustained follow-up in the Chinese healthcare context remains limited. This study aimed to explore these barriers using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior) model, to provide insights for improving follow-up strategies and chronic disease management.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Sixteen patients who had discontinued follow-up at a cardiovascular-metabolic clinic in Beijing completed in-depth interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.
resultsAnalysis identified three COM-B domains comprising 10 barrier-related and 6 facilitator-related subthemes. Capability barriers included limited disease knowledge and age-related constraints. Opportunity barriers centred on logistical burdens and limited family support, while facilitators involved easier appointment access and caregiver assistance. Reflective motivational barriers included distrust and cognitive bias between traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine and a low perceived benefit of follow-up, while automatic motivational barriers involved weak habit formation for routine clinic attendance.
conclusionPatients’ loss to follow-up reflected the combined effects of limited disease understanding, weak self-management ability, logistical and access barriers, insufficient family support, and belief-driven motivational challenges. Improving follow-up adherence requires coordinated, patient-centred strategies that enhance understanding, ease practical barriers, and strengthen motivation through supportive and trust-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.