Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913200›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

A Health Navigator intervention to address the health-related social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in an Australian inpatient setting: a mixed-methods feasibility study.

Kate Neadley, Joanne Koch, Mark Boyd, Maeve Downes, John Lynch, Lily Chan, Brianna Poirier, Cheryl Shoubridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate NeadleySchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joanne KochSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mark BoydNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Maeve DownesNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
John LynchSchool of Public Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lily ChanNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Brianna PoirierAdelaide Dental School, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cheryl ShoubridgeSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. cheryl.shoubridge@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions to address patients’ health-related social needs (HRSNs) using a Health Navigator (HN) are increasingly prevalent in health systems across many countries. Evidence suggests HN interventions based in paediatric health settings may address caregivers’ HRSNs, with potential long-term health benefits for children. HN interventions occur mostly in primary care, despite the barriers to access this care experienced by disadvantaged populations. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a HN intervention to address the HRSNs of caregivers of children admitted to a paediatric inpatient setting in Australia.

methodsThis is a mixed-methods feasibility trial. The study occurred in an inpatient paediatric ward of a major hospital serving a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. Caregivers of admitted children who reported HRSNs and requested assistance were connected to the HN intervention for a three-month period of HN-led advocacy and referrals to community and government organisations. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility was measured quantitatively using process measures, e.g. intervention uptake and completion. A success threshold of 80% was set for process measures. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with (1) caregivers of who participated in the intervention, (2) caregivers who declined to participate in the intervention, and (3) ward team members, to explore intervention acceptability. Secondary measures included intervention effects on participants’ HRSNs, and participant satisfaction with the HN service.

resultsTen participants took part in the HN intervention. The intervention was not feasible due to caregivers’ fear of mandatory reporting requirements and ward team members’ clinical workloads. Participants, caregivers and ward team members suggest outpatient settings as more appropriate for the HN intervention.

conclusionsThe HN intervention was not appropriate for this paediatric inpatient population. This study suggests clinical and population context impact HN intervention uptake. Further research is required to determine if HN interventions are feasible and acceptable in Australian outpatient paediatric settings. TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial was prospectively registered on 22 April 2024 in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR reference: ACTRN12624000494538) (URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=387375%26isReview=true ).

Indexed as

CaregiversChild, HospitalizedPatient NavigationAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInpatientsInterviews as TopicMaleHealth equityHealth-related social needsPediatricsSocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID41913200
PMCPMC13154578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.