ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Sacrifice and solicitation: an empirical ethics study of egg provider blogs.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEgg providers have the right to complete and accurate information about egg donation before deciding to donate. Many seek information beyond clinics and agencies, relying on fertility clinic or agency websites and testimonials of (former) egg providers. While several studies have examined fertility clinic websites, online narratives from experienced egg providers remain largely unexplored. This study analyzes how egg providers narrate their experiences in online blogs.
methodsA systematic online search was conducted between August 2021 and September 2023 to identify blogs written by egg providers and published independently from clinics and agencies. This resulted in 23 blogs that were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis combined with interdisciplinary collaborative auditing.
resultsThe bloggers contributed to the creation of a community where (prospective) egg providers could inform and support each other. Comparable to travel guides that provide comprehensive repositories of information, the bloggers encouraged their readers interested in egg donation to further explore and consider the option with informed awareness of the possible risks and negative outcomes and to advocate for themselves. Decisions to stop donating were detailed with extensive thought and explanation, while decisions to donate again were described as the default choice.
conclusionsIn providing information about egg donation and encouraging others to donate, the bloggers often took on the role of peer recruiters. Bloggers' lived experiences provide insights often missing from clinical sources, complementing medical facts with the everyday, embodied realities of egg donation. However, the blogs also showed patterns that reflect the notion of gendered altruism, where egg providers feel a deep, sometimes self-sacrificial, responsibility to intended parents lived experiences provide inrents. Given that the bloggers actively encouraged their readers to donate, the notion of complicity warrants further examination in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.