ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
How deep resolve affects the stability of texture features for different MR image acceleration methods - a phantom and a human brain study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluates the stability of texture features in MRI reconstructed with and without a vendor-provided deep learning method across different acceleration techniques, including GRAPPA and SMS. The aim is to assess how such reconstructions influence the preservation of diagnostically relevant image textures in phantom and brain scans.
methodsMRI scans were performed on a 1.5T system using a fluid-filled phantom and healthy volunteers. T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences were acquired with varying GRAPPA, SMS, and Deep Resolve settings. A total of 570 texture features were extracted from regions of interest using MaZda software. Stability was evaluated using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
resultsIn phantom data, high concordance between Deep Resolve and standard reconstruction was rare (0–2 features with Lin > 0.9), and the number of features with Lin > 0.8 decreased with higher acceleration. SMS2 and GRAPPA R = 2 preserved the largest number of features (up to 27–151 with Lin > 0.8). In brain images, 36–414 features achieved Lin > 0.8 depending on tissue and acceleration, with cerebrospinal fluid and white matter showing greater concordance than cortex. Deep Resolve also produced a higher number of features meeting the Wilcoxon criterion for equal medians (p ≥ 0.05), particularly under moderate acceleration (e.g., up to 486 features in cortex for GRAPPA R = 2).
conclusionDeep Resolve modifies MRI texture features in a manner that depends on tissue type and acceleration factor. The highest texture stability was observed under moderate acceleration, while higher acceleration consistently reduced concordance. These findings highlight the need to account for reconstruction effects when using texture-based or radiomic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.