ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
Linkage- and ROH-based genomic relationship matrices for IBD based management of genetic diversity.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe goal of managing genetic diversity is to maintain both the genomic uniqueness and adaptability of a population. This entails both maintaining heterozygosity and avoiding deleterious alleles from drifting to higher frequencies. Thus, genomic management strategies should not systematically change frequencies at neutral loci, as has been observed in current genomic management. We simulated 50 replicates of a population managed with optimal contribution selection (OCS), where inbreeding was controlled using different relationship matrices, where Van Raden method I (GVR), runs-of-homozygosity (GROH), and identity by descent relationships (IBD) only used genomic information and a linkage analysis-based matrix (GFGLA) leveraged both genomic and pedigree information.
resultsAcross 50 simulated replicates, GFGLA achieved the highest correlation with true IBD for both inbreeding and coancestry estimates and provided the most accurate rate of inbreeding (ΔF). GFGLA also delivered the greatest genetic gain per unit of inbreeding and was the only scheme to remain below the inbreeding target while minimizing frequency change at neutral loci. GVR using base population frequencies produced high genetic gain and controlled drift effectively but introduced systematic allele frequency changes towards the closest extreme frequency. Using current allele frequency resulted in high levels of inbreeding compared to the genetic gain achieved. GROH showed strong dependence on the minimum ROH length: short ROH improved ΔF estimation but increased allele frequency changes toward intermediate values, whereas long ROH underestimated inbreeding and reduced genetic gain.
conclusionsIBD-based matrices such as GFGLA offer the most balanced approach for sustainable population management in OCS schemes, combining accurate relationship estimates, effective inbreeding control, and neutrality at neutral loci. In contrast, GVR and GROH require calibration and cause systematic allele frequency changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.