ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Community Partnerships in Clinical Research: A Framework for Sustainability and Resilience.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variable health outcomes across populations remain chronic challenges in modern healthcare, due in part to an imbalance in participation in clinical research. Rather than base novel therapeutics on narrow cohorts that limit validity and generalizability, we should broaden our commitments to developing solutions that benefit all populations. Many participants remain hesitant due to mistrust in research and medical institutions; however, novel approaches are necessary to bridge the gap in research representation. These concerns are particularly prominent in Indigenous communities, which have faced a long history of unethical research practices. Community-based participatory research methods can aid researchers in improving research access by centering community engagement at the core of the research partnership and enabling co-creation of research priorities. We have created a community-academic partnership with an Indigenous community in Montana over almost two decades, built on mutual respect and learning. Drawing on our partnership, we present community-engaged strategies that together form a framework for building meaningful, enduring community partnerships that foster trust in research. This framework can help to ensure that clinical research opportunities are more broadly available, supporting the diffusion of health innovations to every patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.