ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Association Between Clinical Tumor Stage and Response to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Outcomes in cT3 Versus cT4 Disease.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is standard for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), enabling organ preservation in patients who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR). However, the influence of clinical tumor stage (cT) on response rates and long-term outcomes remains incompletely defined. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 121 patients with cT3 or cT4 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with TNT between 2019 and 2024 at a single tertiary care center were analyzed. Rates of cCR, tumor regrowth, distant metastasis, and mortality were compared between cT3 and cT4 groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with cCR in the overall cohort and among patients with cT4 specifically.
resultsOverall, 32.8% of patients achieved a cCR: 38% patients with cT3 disease and 23% with cT4 (p = 0.09). In adjusted analysis, cT4 disease was independently associated with a reduced odds of achieving cCR (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.88). Among patients achieving cCR, 86.8% pursued organ preservation, with no significant differences in regrowth (27% cT3 versus 17% cT4; p = 0.75) or mortality. Among patients with cT4, no independent predictors of cCR were identified. Time to metastatic disease and mortality did not differ significantly between groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with cT4 rectal cancer are significantly less likely to achieve a cCR following TNT compared with those with cT3 tumors. However, among those who do achieve cCR, rates of regrowth and long-term outcomes are comparable. Clinical tumor stage may aid in counseling patients on the likelihood of nonoperative management after TNT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41913017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.