Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913017›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Association Between Clinical Tumor Stage and Response to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Outcomes in cT3 Versus cT4 Disease.

Emily F Simon, Kamil Erozkan, Kristen M Westfall, Saher-Zahra Khan, Kayvan Barekatain, Emily Steinhagen, Ronald Charles

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily F SimonDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. emily.simon2@uhhospitals.org.
Kamil ErozkanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kristen M WestfallDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Saher-Zahra KhanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kayvan BarekatainDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Emily SteinhagenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ronald CharlesDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is standard for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), enabling organ preservation in patients who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR). However, the influence of clinical tumor stage (cT) on response rates and long-term outcomes remains incompletely defined. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 121 patients with cT3 or cT4 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with TNT between 2019 and 2024 at a single tertiary care center were analyzed. Rates of cCR, tumor regrowth, distant metastasis, and mortality were compared between cT3 and cT4 groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with cCR in the overall cohort and among patients with cT4 specifically.

resultsOverall, 32.8% of patients achieved a cCR: 38% patients with cT3 disease and 23% with cT4 (p = 0.09). In adjusted analysis, cT4 disease was independently associated with a reduced odds of achieving cCR (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.88). Among patients achieving cCR, 86.8% pursued organ preservation, with no significant differences in regrowth (27% cT3 versus 17% cT4; p = 0.75) or mortality. Among patients with cT4, no independent predictors of cCR were identified. Time to metastatic disease and mortality did not differ significantly between groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with cT4 rectal cancer are significantly less likely to achieve a cCR following TNT compared with those with cT3 tumors. However, among those who do achieve cCR, rates of regrowth and long-term outcomes are comparable. Clinical tumor stage may aid in counseling patients on the likelihood of nonoperative management after TNT.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPathologic Complete ResponsePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateClinical tumor stageComplete clinical responseLocally advanced rectal cancerOrgan preservationTotal neoadjuvant therapyTumor regrowthWatch-and-wait

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.