Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913001›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

Impact of fog on California waterfowl flight activity: historical and modern insights into effects post-Clean Air Act.

Fiona McDuie, Cory T Overton, Austen A Lorenz, J Patrick Donnelly, Desmond A Mackell, Elliott L Matchett, Mark Petrie, Michael L Casazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fiona McDuieU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA. fionamcduie@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-5613
Cory T OvertonU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
Austen A LorenzU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
J Patrick DonnellyUS Fish & Wildlife Service, Intermountain West Joint Venture, Migratory Bird Program, 1001 S. Higgins Avenue, Suite A1, Missoula, MT, 59801, USA.
Desmond A MackellU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
Elliott L MatchettU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.
Mark PetrieDucks Unlimited, 3074 Gold Canal Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA, 95670, USA.
Michael L CasazzaU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since establishment of the Clean Air Act in the early 1970s, occurrence of the dense 'Tule Fog', historically prevalent throughout winter across California's Central Valley, has substantially reduced. At the same time, waterfowl body masses have generally increased. Flight is metabolically expensive, and fog visually and navigationally impairs birds in flight, likely causing them to remain aloft for longer than usual periods. If less fog results in less flight and reduced energy expenditure, then fewer winter Tule fog events could contribute to increased body masses of California waterfowl since the mid-1980's. Therefore, we aimed to assess the relationship between waterfowl flight and fog occurrence/density with historic (1991-93) and modern (2015-23) waterfowl tracking data in the Central Valley of California (CCV). Historic tracking data showed that the probability of flight increased with increasing fog density. Birds were significantly more likely to fly in fog than when there was no fog and most likely to fly in heavy fog. Modern data showed similar responses to fog with flight occurring significantly more during dawn fog events. This relationship between improved waterfowl body mass and fewer fog events may provide an opportunity to redirect scarce funding to focus on other population requirements such as improving habitats for nesting, molting and brood rearing that are currently lacking. Unanticipated benefits of the Clean Air Act should stand as a strong recommendation to maintaining this Act into the future.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalWeatherAnimalsCaliforniaSeasonsClean Air ActEnergeticsFlightPollutionRadiation fogTule fogWaterfowl

Identifiers

PMID41913001
PMCPMC13095937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.