Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912993›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Snip  & Stitch: a simple and accessible correction for the pupil foreshortening error.

Koert H Stribos, Damian Koevoet, Yuqing Cai, Marnix Naber, Christoph Strauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Koert H StribosExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Damian KoevoetExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yuqing CaiExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marnix NaberExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christoph StrauchExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.strauch@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-8635

Funding

European Research Council 863732Sociale en Geesteswetenschappen, NWO VI.Veni.241G.005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern eye trackers allow easy measurement of pupil size, a powerful physiological marker of cognitive processing. A major hindrance to using pupillometry is the so-called pupil foreshortening error (PFE). The PFE is the apparent change in pupil size that results from a change in the angle of the eye relative to the camera, despite the pupil remaining constant in reality. To prevent this, experimenters often rely on fixed gaze, limiting design flexibility. Existing correction methods necessitate specific geometric properties of the setup, often unavailable for existing datasets, and do not work for all tracker types. We here introduce 'Snip  & Stitch', a straightforward, accessible, and easy-to-implement correction for the PFE. Specifically, Snip  & Stitch corrects the PFE by 'snipping' pupil size changes during a saccade, and 'stitching' pupil size back by subtracting the difference between pre- and post-saccadic pupil size. Our results demonstrate that this simple method reduced the PFE by an estimated 71-81%. Snip  & Stitch is openly available online. We recommend Snip  & Stitch, especially for experiments in which participants make one saccade before pupil size is compared, and argue that the method can be easily applied to experiments in which participants make up to five saccades in sequence. Limitations and possible further improvements are discussed. Together, Snip  & Stitch allows researchers to employ pupil size as an outcome measure in a wide range of tasks and setups.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyPupilSaccadesHumansGazePupil foreshortening errorPupil sizeSaccade

Identifiers

PMID41912993
PMCPMC13035544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.