ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Snip & Stitch: a simple and accessible correction for the pupil foreshortening error.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern eye trackers allow easy measurement of pupil size, a powerful physiological marker of cognitive processing. A major hindrance to using pupillometry is the so-called pupil foreshortening error (PFE). The PFE is the apparent change in pupil size that results from a change in the angle of the eye relative to the camera, despite the pupil remaining constant in reality. To prevent this, experimenters often rely on fixed gaze, limiting design flexibility. Existing correction methods necessitate specific geometric properties of the setup, often unavailable for existing datasets, and do not work for all tracker types. We here introduce 'Snip & Stitch', a straightforward, accessible, and easy-to-implement correction for the PFE. Specifically, Snip & Stitch corrects the PFE by 'snipping' pupil size changes during a saccade, and 'stitching' pupil size back by subtracting the difference between pre- and post-saccadic pupil size. Our results demonstrate that this simple method reduced the PFE by an estimated 71-81%. Snip & Stitch is openly available online. We recommend Snip & Stitch, especially for experiments in which participants make one saccade before pupil size is compared, and argue that the method can be easily applied to experiments in which participants make up to five saccades in sequence. Limitations and possible further improvements are discussed. Together, Snip & Stitch allows researchers to employ pupil size as an outcome measure in a wide range of tasks and setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.