ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Early planning of response content and form when answering questions.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early form approaches to language production suggest that interlocutors plan both the content and form of their utterances as early as possible while their partner is speaking. Late form approaches suggest that the content of an interlocutor's response is planned early, but the form of the response is planned closer to the time when the interlocutor will begin speaking. We tested these accounts in a question-answering paradigm modeled after Corps and Pickering (2024). Participants answered trivia questions. The information required to answer each question was either presented early (Which animal barks and is also a common household pet?) or late (Which animal is a common household pet and also barks?) in the question. The target answer was either short (typically, one word) or long (more than one word). Participants responded more quickly when the critical information appeared early in the question and when the answer was short. There was also an interaction, where the effect of answer length was more pronounced when the critical information appeared late in the question. The results are consistent with the early form account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.