ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
From DICOM to Dose: An Automated Python Platform for Patient-Specific CT Dosimetry.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces an automated Python-based framework for the accurate calculation of water-equivalent diameter (Dw), effective diameter (Deff), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) using a hybrid segmentation strategy. The algorithm integrates DICOM metadata extraction, Hounsfield Unit (HU) conversion, and interactive anatomical segmentation, combining automated HU thresholding with user-guided refinement and morphological processing to ensure robust contour delineation. The framework was validated against commercial software (Indose_CT) and expert manual segmentation using 470 clinical CT scans (270 head and 200 chest). For head scans, strong agreement was observed for Dw (r = 0.960, bias = 0.016 cm) and SSDE (r = 0.960, bias = 0.78 mGy). Chest scans demonstrated excellent accuracy, with Dw (r = 0.987, bias = 0.16 cm) and SSDE (r = 0.999, bias = 0.008 mGy). Expert validation on 100 cases confirmed near-expert segmentation performance, achieving Dice similarity coefficients of 0.966 ± 0.018 (head) and 0.953 ± 0.024 (chest), Hausdorff distances of 2.6 ± 0.8 mm (head) and 3.1 ± 1.2 mm (chest), and average surface distances below 2 mm. Importantly, segmentation discrepancies resulted in clinically negligible dosimetric differences: mean SSDE deviations were 0.360 ± 0.252 mGy (0.94%) for head and 0.142 ± 0.097 mGy (1.26%) for chest, with 98% of cases showing less than 2% deviation from expert measurements. The proposed hybrid approach effectively addresses segmentation challenges in complex anatomical cases through real-time user adjustment while maintaining efficient batch-processing capabilities via an intuitive graphical interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.