Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912963›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

From DICOM to Dose: An Automated Python Platform for Patient-Specific CT Dosimetry.

Abdellah Khallouqi, Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Halimi, Omar El Rhazouani, Anass Drissi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdellah KhallouqiSciences and Engineering of Biomedicals, Biophysics and Health Laboratory, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco. a.khallouqi@uhp.ac.ma.
Hamza SekkatSciences and Engineering of Biomedicals, Biophysics and Health Laboratory, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco.
Abdellah HalimiSciences and Engineering of Biomedicals, Biophysics and Health Laboratory, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco.
Omar El RhazouaniSciences and Engineering of Biomedicals, Biophysics and Health Laboratory, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco.
Anass DrissiSciences and Engineering of Biomedicals, Biophysics and Health Laboratory, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces an automated Python-based framework for the accurate calculation of water-equivalent diameter (Dw), effective diameter (Deff), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) using a hybrid segmentation strategy. The algorithm integrates DICOM metadata extraction, Hounsfield Unit (HU) conversion, and interactive anatomical segmentation, combining automated HU thresholding with user-guided refinement and morphological processing to ensure robust contour delineation. The framework was validated against commercial software (Indose_CT) and expert manual segmentation using 470 clinical CT scans (270 head and 200 chest). For head scans, strong agreement was observed for Dw (r = 0.960, bias = 0.016 cm) and SSDE (r = 0.960, bias = 0.78 mGy). Chest scans demonstrated excellent accuracy, with Dw (r = 0.987, bias = 0.16 cm) and SSDE (r = 0.999, bias = 0.008 mGy). Expert validation on 100 cases confirmed near-expert segmentation performance, achieving Dice similarity coefficients of 0.966 ± 0.018 (head) and 0.953 ± 0.024 (chest), Hausdorff distances of 2.6 ± 0.8 mm (head) and 3.1 ± 1.2 mm (chest), and average surface distances below 2 mm. Importantly, segmentation discrepancies resulted in clinically negligible dosimetric differences: mean SSDE deviations were 0.360 ± 0.252 mGy (0.94%) for head and 0.142 ± 0.097 mGy (1.26%) for chest, with 98% of cases showing less than 2% deviation from expert measurements. The proposed hybrid approach effectively addresses segmentation challenges in complex anatomical cases through real-time user adjustment while maintaining efficient batch-processing capabilities via an intuitive graphical interface.

Indexed as

Automated segmentationCT imagingEffective diameterRadiation dose optimizationSize-specific dose estimateWater-equivalent diameter

Identifiers

PMID41912963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.