Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912962›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Diagnostic Improvement in Endoleak Detection: The Role of Low-energy Virtual Monochromatic CT and Deep Learning Reconstruction.

Takatoshi Higashigawa, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Ken Nakajima, Tatsuhiro Kobayashi, Kensuke Domae, Akio Yamazaki, Noriyuki Kato, Hiroaki Kato, Yuki Yamaoka, Hajime Sakuma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Takatoshi HigashigawaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. higashikawat@med.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-5842
Yasutaka IchikawaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Ken NakajimaDepartment of Radiology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, 471-2 1-Chome Funae, Ise, Mie, 516-8512, Japan.
Tatsuhiro KobayashiDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Kensuke DomaeDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Akio YamazakiDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Noriyuki KatoDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Hiroaki KatoDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Yuki YamaokaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Hajime SakumaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic performance of low-energy virtual monochromatic CT imaging (VMI) combined with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for detecting endoleaks. Seventy-one patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) were retrospectively studied, with endoleaks being identified in 41 (58%) of them. CT raw data were reconstructed using three techniques: 70-keV VMI with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR [ASiR-V50%]), and 40- and 70-keV VMI with DLIR (TrueFidelity-H). Three observers evaluated the presence or absence of endoleaks on a 5- point scale, taking into account the confidence level: score 1, definitely absent; score 2, probably absent; score 3, possibly present; score 4, probably present; score 5, definitely present. Scores of ≥ 3 were considered positive for endoleaks. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to compare the area under the curve (AUC) values. ROC analyses demonstrated that the 40-keV VMI with DLIR achieved the highest AUC across observers (0.92-0.99), outperforming the 70-keV DLIR (0.91-0.97) and 70-keV HIR (0.88-0.96). The proportion of correctly identified endoleaks with high confidence (score ≥ 4) was significantly greater, or at least comparable, for 40-keV VMI with DLIR versus 70-keV VMI with HIR (Observer 1: 85% [35/41] vs. 73% [30/41], p = 0.02; Observer 2: 85% [35/41] vs. 78% [32/41], p = 0.20; Observer 3: 98% [40/41] vs. 90% [37/41], p = 0.10). The integration of low-energy VMI with DLIR significantly enhances the diagnostic confidence and accuracy in endoleak detection compared with conventional reconstruction techniques. These findings underscore the clinical utility of advanced reconstruction algorithms for optimizing post-EVAR surveillance.

Indexed as

AortaAortic aneurysmDeep learning image reconstructionDual-energy computed tomographyEndoleak

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.