ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Diagnostic Improvement in Endoleak Detection: The Role of Low-energy Virtual Monochromatic CT and Deep Learning Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the diagnostic performance of low-energy virtual monochromatic CT imaging (VMI) combined with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for detecting endoleaks. Seventy-one patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) were retrospectively studied, with endoleaks being identified in 41 (58%) of them. CT raw data were reconstructed using three techniques: 70-keV VMI with conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR [ASiR-V50%]), and 40- and 70-keV VMI with DLIR (TrueFidelity-H). Three observers evaluated the presence or absence of endoleaks on a 5- point scale, taking into account the confidence level: score 1, definitely absent; score 2, probably absent; score 3, possibly present; score 4, probably present; score 5, definitely present. Scores of ≥ 3 were considered positive for endoleaks. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to compare the area under the curve (AUC) values. ROC analyses demonstrated that the 40-keV VMI with DLIR achieved the highest AUC across observers (0.92-0.99), outperforming the 70-keV DLIR (0.91-0.97) and 70-keV HIR (0.88-0.96). The proportion of correctly identified endoleaks with high confidence (score ≥ 4) was significantly greater, or at least comparable, for 40-keV VMI with DLIR versus 70-keV VMI with HIR (Observer 1: 85% [35/41] vs. 73% [30/41], p = 0.02; Observer 2: 85% [35/41] vs. 78% [32/41], p = 0.20; Observer 3: 98% [40/41] vs. 90% [37/41], p = 0.10). The integration of low-energy VMI with DLIR significantly enhances the diagnostic confidence and accuracy in endoleak detection compared with conventional reconstruction techniques. These findings underscore the clinical utility of advanced reconstruction algorithms for optimizing post-EVAR surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.