Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912956›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

A Hybrid Multi-CNN Feature Fusion and LASSO Optimization Approach for High-Performance Breast Cancer Classification.

Tawfiq Beghriche, Mohamed Djerioui, Youcef Brik, Bilal Attallah, Ibraheem Shayea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tawfiq BeghricheDepartment of Electronics, Faculty of Technology, University of M'sila University Pole, Road Bordj Bou Arreridj, M'sila, 28000, Algeria. tawfiq.beghriche@univ-msila.dz.
Mohamed DjeriouiDepartment of Electronics, Faculty of Technology, University of M'sila University Pole, Road Bordj Bou Arreridj, M'sila, 28000, Algeria.
Youcef BrikDepartment of Electronics, Faculty of Technology, University of M'sila University Pole, Road Bordj Bou Arreridj, M'sila, 28000, Algeria.
Bilal AttallahDepartment of Electronics, Faculty of Technology, University of M'sila University Pole, Road Bordj Bou Arreridj, M'sila, 28000, Algeria.
Ibraheem ShayeaElectrical Electronics & Communications Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of mortality among women worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for accurate and early detection methods to improve survival rates. Although deep learning, particularly transfer learning with pretrained CNNs, has shown promise in medical image analysis, relying on a single model may limit the depth of learned representations. We present a hybrid approach that leverages the complementary strengths of three well-established CNNs, such as MobileNetV2, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3 for robust breast cancer diagnosis. Our methodology involves extracting pertinent features from the breast ultrasound images (BUSI) dataset containing 780 images using each model individually, followed by the fusion and transformation of these features into a high-dimensional combined vector. This fusion strategy effectively integrates diverse learned knowledge, thereby mitigating the risk of overfitting. Subsequently, we employ LASSO-driven feature selection to identify a reduced set of the most informative features within the fused representation, which can enhance model interpretability and potentially improve generalizability. The dataset was systematically divided using a five-fold cross-validation mechanism and reported as mean ± standard deviation to support reliable model training and evaluation. The proposed method achieved promising results, with an accuracy of 99.23 ± 0.49%, sensitivity of 98.57 ± 1.90%, specificity of 99.54 ± 0.56%, precision of 99.07 ± 1.14%, F1-score of 98.80 ± 0.77%, and AUC of 0.9985 ± 0.0019, outperforming state-of-the-art techniques on the evaluated dataset. Future work will focus on validation using larger, multicenter datasets.

Indexed as

Breast cancer detectionDeep learningFeature fusionFeature selectionLASSO regressionTransfer learningUltrasound images

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.