ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026
[Mental health status of medical students-A nationwide cross-sectional study].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mental health status of medical students regarding depressive symptoms suicidal ideation and mental stress has become the subject of increasing scientific research; however, in Germany, no nationwide surveys have so far been performed. The present study presents the results from the first nationwide survey on the mental health of medical students in Germany. The aim of this article is to present the general aspects on psychological and physical health as well as specific data regarding depressive symptoms of German medical students. The data were analyzed in a semester-based and gender-based comparison and possible risk or protective factors were evaluated.
methodsApplying an online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic of 8137 medical students from all German medical faculties and study semesters, we collected diverse sociodemographic variables as well as data on psychological and physical health status based on single item measures and questionnaires. Besides sociodemographic information this paper presents data on the physical and mental health status (using single item measures and the Beck Depression Inventory II, BDI-II) as well as correlating influencing factors. Group differences were measured by comparison of mean values and the multivariate dependencies between BDI-II scores and further covariates were analyzed. The survey was completed by 48.3% of the respondents.
resultsOf the respondents 13.8% stated that they were not physically healthy and 36.1% stated that they felt mentally unwell. Using the BDI-II questionnaire, at least mild depressive symptoms were identified in 51.1% of respondents in the first semester. Of the respondents 22% reported current suicidal thoughts. Potential risk and protective factors could be identified, which significantly correlated with the BDI-II scores. Among those risk factors were female gender, lower age, physical complaints, need of university support and the presence of a migration background. In contrast, social support, sports and social engagement seem to be potential protective factors.
conclusionOur analyses showed that medical students have a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms compared to the general population, whereby the survey during the pandemic hindered the direct comparison with pre-pandemic data. The possible risk and protective factors identified can serve as a basis for the development of preventive programs to improve the mental health of medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.