ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Timing of antithrombotic therapy resumption after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition in elderly patients, driven by angiogenic and inflammatory membrane activity rather than acute trauma. While burr-hole drainage remains the standard treatment, the timing of postoperative antithrombotic resumption remains heterogeneous. Early restart could prevent thromboembolic complications but may raise concern for recurrence.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (2003–2025), identifying adults undergoing surgical drainage of cSDH. Exposure groups were defined by timing of postoperative antithrombotic therapy: ≤7 days, 8–14 days, 15–28 days, and no therapy within 3 months. Outcomes included 180-day all-cause mortality (primary) and reoperation for recurrence (secondary). Propensity score matching balanced demographics, vascular comorbidities, thromboembolic histories as proxies for indication, and preoperative antithrombotic use.
resultsAmong 11,608 patients, 906 restarted ≤ 7 days, 402 at 8–14 days, 198 at 15–28 days, and 10,102 had no therapy within 3 months. After matching, restart ≤ 7 days was associated with lower mortality versus prolonged non-resumption (18.4% vs. 26.5%; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.79; P < 0.001) without higher reoperation (7.8% vs. 9.1%; P = 0.34). Similar mortality associations were observed for restart at 8–14 days (OR 0.68; P = 0.025) and 15–28 days (OR 0.53; P = 0.014). Mortality and reoperation did not differ significantly between ≤ 7 and 8–14 days.
conclusionsPostoperative antithrombotic restart within 1 month after cSDH evacuation was associated with lower 180-day mortality without higher recurrence. These findings warrant prospective confirmation incorporating hematoma, surgical, imaging, and indication-specific factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.