ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2026
Real-World Retention Rate, Effectiveness, and Safety of Netakimab in the Treatment of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Two-Year Results of the Real Word Evidence LIBRA Study.
Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
-The aim of the study was to obtain data on the safety of netakimab (NTK) in a population of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), including various somatic diseases, as well as to assess treatment retention during 2 years of observation in real world clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methods-Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included 137 patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment. Clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at 12, 24, 52, 76, and 104 weeks of therapy were collected within the study. The average age of the patients 42.3 years, 34.3% of them with previous biologics therapy.
results-Median observation period was 104 weeks (range 1-137 weeks). At the end of the analyzed period (104 weeks of therapy), 85.5% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 79.7-91.8) of patients continued treatment with netakimab. Retention on NTK therapy was slightly better in "bio-naïve" vs patients who received biologics earlier: 88.7% (95% CI: 82.3-95.5) and 78.9% (95% CI: 67.5-92.2), respectively, without significant differences between groups (p = 0.16). As many as 21 (15.3%) patients withdrew from study before visit 6. The main end-of-study reasons were lost to follow-up (7 (5.1%) patients) and treatment inefficacy (6 (4.4%) patients). The BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) and ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) showed statistically significant decreases from baseline: by 3 times during the first 3 months of therapy and 2 times decrease during the first year of treatment. This trend continued in the second year of treatment, although with a lower rate of reduction. By week 104 of therapy, 52.9% (95% CI: 47.3-58.4) reached low disease activity (1.3 ≤ ASDAS < 2.1), 21.3% (95% CI: 12.8-29.8) had inactive disease (ASDAS < 1.3). Netakimab was well tolerated by patients: AEs, related to therapy according to the investigator's opinion, were reported in 8 (6.0%) patients.
conclusions-In real-world clinical practice, 85.5% of patients continued treatment with Netakimab at the end of 104 weeks. By 104 weeks 74% patients had low disease activity or inactive disease. Netakimab was well tolerated by most of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912852What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.