Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912832›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

An AI-powered research assistant in the lab: A practical guide for text analysis through iterative collaboration with LLMs.

Gino Carmona-Díaz, William Jiménez-Leal, María Alejandra Grisales, Chandra Sripada, Santiago Amaya, Michael Inzlicht, Juan Pablo Bermúdez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gino Carmona-DíazSocial and Human Sciences Faculty, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. g.carmona@uniandes.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-2557
William Jiménez-LealPsychology Department, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
María Alejandra GrisalesSocial and Human Sciences Faculty, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Chandra SripadaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Santiago AmayaLaboratorio de Emociones y Juicios Morales, Universidad de Los Andes, Edificio Franco, Cra. 1 #18a-12, Bogotá, Colombia.
Michael InzlichtDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Juan Pablo BermúdezSocial and Human Sciences Faculty, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

John Templeton Foundation 62622John Templeton Foundation Self-Control in Context
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing texts such as open-ended responses, headlines, or social media posts is a time- and labor-intensive process highly susceptible to bias. However, large language models (LLMs) are promising tools for text analysis, using either a predefined (top-down) or a data-driven (bottom-up) taxonomy, without sacrificing quality. Here, we present a step-by-step tutorial to efficiently develop, test, and apply taxonomies for analyzing unstructured data through an iterative and collaborative process between researchers and an LLM. Using personal goals provided by participants as an example, we demonstrate how we used this method to write prompts to review datasets and generate a taxonomy of life domains, evaluate and refine the taxonomy through prompt and direct modifications, and apply the taxonomy to categorize an entire dataset with high intercoder reliability, while achieving high levels of human-LLM intercoder agreement, reducing analysis time by approximately 87.5%. This test offers a proof of concept, suggesting that with the right procedures LLMs can be used to generate reliable bottom-up categorizations. We discuss the possibilities and limitations of using LLMs for text analysis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansIntelligent SystemsArtificial intelligenceGPTLarge language modelsQualitative analysisTaxonomiesText analysisTutorial

Identifiers

PMID41912832
PMCPMC13035871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.