ArticleScientific reports2026
Quality and reliability of femoral neck fracture educational short videos: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The quality and reliability of short videos about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients increasingly use short-video platforms (TikTok, Bilibili) for education, but content quality and reliability are underexplored. Objective: To systematically evaluate FNF-related educational short videos on TikTok and Bilibili, and explore associations between video characteristics, user engagement, and quality scores. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 166 top-ranked videos (accessed in May 2025 as guest users) using modified DISCERN, Global Quality Score (GQS), the newly developed Femoral Neck Fracture-Specific Clinical Comprehensiveness Score (FNF-SCCS), and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). Videos were categorized by uploader type and content theme; non-parametric statistics, Cohen’s kappa, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) assessed associations and inter-rater reliability. Results: Professionals created 59.04% of content, non-professionals 25.9%. Bilibili videos were longer (162s vs. 59s, P < 0.05) and higher-quality (GQS ≥ 4: 43.7% vs. 12.6%; DISCERN ≥ 4: 40.9% vs. 23.2%, P < 0.05). Disease knowledge and rehabilitation training videos scored highest (DISCERN = 4, GQS = 4), personal experiences lowest (DISCERN = 2, GQS = 2). FNF-SCCS (ICC = 0.91) and PEMAT-A/V (ICC = 0.89) showed excellent inter-rater reliability; professional institutions/individuals outperformed non-professionals in FNF-SCCS and PEMAT understandability (Median = 75.0% vs. 58.3%, P < 0.001), while overall actionability was low except for rehabilitation training videos (Median = 100.0%). Engagement weakly correlated with quality (r=-0.21–0.08); Cohen’s kappa = 0.806–0.839. Conclusions: FNF-related content on TikTok and Bilibili exhibits suboptimal quality, with professional sources outperforming non-professional ones. Critical gaps exist in guideline adherence and actionable instructions. Platforms and healthcare professionals should optimize medical content dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.