Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Attribute development for a discrete choice experiment to examine preferences for long-acting HIV prevention products among pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Sophia M Ngugi, Elizabeth Echoka, Vincent Were, Nicholas Thuo, Vallery Ogello, Maryeve Gikwa, Nelson Muteti, Paul Mwangi, Jacob Kazungu, Kenneth Ngure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophia M NgugiSchool of Public Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya. sophiengugi30@gmail.com.
Elizabeth EchokaKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Public Health Research, Nairobi, Kenya.
Vincent WereData Synergy and Evaluation Unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicholas ThuoKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Research, Partners in Health and Research Development, Thika, Kenya.
Vallery OgelloKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Research, Partners in Health and Research Development, Thika, Kenya.
Maryeve GikwaKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Research, Partners in Health and Research Development, Thika, Kenya.
Nelson MutetiKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Research, Partners in Health and Research Development, Thika, Kenya.
Paul MwangiKenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Research, Partners in Health and Research Development, Thika, Kenya.
Jacob KazunguHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenneth NgureSchool of Public Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

MSD MISP # 61171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) is gaining popularity as a means of exploring preferences on health-related issues. The quality and validity of DCEs largely depend on the formative phase of attribute development. This paper documents a systematic attribute development process for a DCE assessing preferences for long-acting HIV prevention products among pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBFW) in Kenya. We applied the Helter and Boehler four-stage attribute development framework, comprising raw data collection, data reduction, removal of inappropriate attributes, and appropriate wording. Through literature review and qualitative approaches, we identified twelve attributes for products formulated as oral tablets, injections, vaginal rings, and implants. Six of the twelve attributes were considered plausible, salient, and capable of being traded, namely dosing frequency, effectiveness in HIV prevention, ability to prevent pregnancy, ability to prevent sexually transmitted infections, product access location, and product cost. A pilot among thirty PBFW confirmed the clarity and relevance of the six attributes, informing their inclusion in the DCE. Documenting this transparent step-by-step process improves transparency and facilitates objective evaluation of the DCE's formative phase. These findings contribute to methodological rigour in DCE design and provide empirical evidence for expanding preference-based HIV prevention strategies that will benefit PBFW.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsBreast FeedingChoice BehaviorHIV InfectionsPatient PreferenceAdultFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancyAnti-HIV AgentsAttributesDiscrete choice experimentHIV prevention productsKenyaPreferencesPregnant and breastfeeding women

Identifiers

PMID41912737
PMCPMC13039936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.