ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven optimisation of sustainable high-performance concrete incorporating SCMs, biomass ash, and graphene nanoplatelets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study outlines an integrated experimental and data-driven methodology of the development of sustainable high-performance concrete, using a hybrid low-carbon binder, which includes fly ash (FA), ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), thermally treated coir biomass (TTCB) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). M40 grade concrete mixtures were prepared by systematic variation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs, 30% of the total binder), TTCB (5% to 10%) and GNPs dosage (0.08% to 0.12%). Mechanical properties were evaluated at 7 and 28 days, rapid chloride permeability (RCPT), water uptake and residual strength after exposure to 300 °C. The optimised mix delivered a compressive strength of 55 MPa at 28 days, which is approximately 23% greater than the control mix (44-45 MPa at 28 days), and chloride permeability 505 C (42% lower) and water absorption 2.8% (40% lower), respectively. Retention of strength following exposure to 300 °C was above 80%, which means that the thermal stability was improved. Microstructural examinations confirmed refined pore structure, lower content of portlandite and enhanced interfacial bonding. The 60 experimental observations based on replicated specimens in 10 mix designs were trained on Random Forest, XGBoost and CNN LSTM models. XGBoost had the best predictive accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.