ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Teeth as forensic evidence for SRY gene-based gender determination: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstablishing biological gender is essential for human identification. In disaster and medico-legal cases with mutilated, burnt, or decomposed remains, routine skeletal or soft-tissue markers may be unreliable. Teeth are highly resilient and can preserve nuclear DNA. This scoping review maps evidence on PCR-based SRY detection from teeth and oral exfoliated cells, summarizes diagnostic performance across sample types and environmental conditions, and highlights key methodological gaps for future research. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and was reported using the PRISMA-ScR framework. A structured search with MeSH and free-text terms was conducted, and the research question was framed using PIRT. Two reviewers independently screened studies and charted key data on design, sample type, DNA methods, PCR approach, exposure conditions, and outcomes. Methodological quality was also summarized using relevant JBI tools for contextual interpretation.
resultsFour studies were included. Dental pulp was the most reliable substrate for SRY-based gender determination, achieving 100% sensitivity and specificity even after 60-day exposure to seawater, soil, and dry air, while dentin performed poorly. Extreme temperatures reduced sensitivity to ~ 46.7% despite high specificity (~ 93.3%). Among oral trace items, toothbrush samples showed lower specificity due to false positives in females, whereas miswak retained better accuracy over six months. Overall, findings suggest a clear substrate hierarchy favouring pulp over dentin and highlight the influence of environmental stress on test performance. These results also emphasize the need for strict contamination control in trace-item analysis. Standardized protocols and larger studies are required to strengthen real-world forensic applicability.
conclusionsThe mapped evidence supports dental pulp as the most reliable source for SRY-based gender determination in forensic scenarios. Oral trace items may offer practical value in specific contexts, but diagnostic performance varies with storage duration, contamination risk, and methodological heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41912713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.