Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912698›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Opioid prescribing patterns at the end of life in an asian advanced cancer cohort: differences by palliative care consultation status.

Hak Jun Kim, Jin-Ah Sim, Shin Hye Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hak Jun Kim *Department of AI Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Ah Sim *Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shin Hye YooCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital 101, Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. ifi1024@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare RS-2023-KH137917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpioid prescribing at the end of life varies widely across clinical contexts, yet real-world evidence from Asian advanced cancer populations remains limited. This study characterized end-of-life opioid prescribing patterns and examined differences according to palliative care consultation status.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using tertiary hospital clinical records linked to Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Patients with advanced cancer who received a palliative care consultation were matched 1:1 with those without consultation using propensity scores. Opioid prescribing during the last 30 days of life was evaluated, including time-specific patterns across three intervals (30-15, 14-8, and 7-0 days before death) and opioid strength (strong vs. weak).

resultsAmong 18,048 eligible patients, 3,742 were matched in each group. Opioid prescriptions were more common among patients who received palliative care, with the largest differences observed 30-15 days before death and narrowing toward the final week. Strong opioid use remained consistently higher in the palliative care group across all intervals, whereas weak opioid use showed minimal variation. Differences were most pronounced in older adults and in stomach, colorectal, and pancreatobiliary cancers.

conclusionPatients who received a palliative care consultation showed different patterns of end-of-life opioid prescribing, especially for strong opioids. Understanding such variation may support ongoing efforts to improve symptom management near the end of life.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainNeoplasmsPalliative CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Terminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreReferral and ConsultationAnalgesics, OpioidNeoplasmsOpioid analgesicsPain managementPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID41912698
PMCPMC13035612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.