ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-strategy framework for enhancing Harris hawks optimization for global optimization problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent classification with marine predators algorithm and probabilistic neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm often suffers from premature convergence and stagnation on complex, high-dimensional problems, particularly in wrapper-based feature selection (FS) for medical diagnosis, where costly fitness evaluations demand efficient search strategies. This paper proposes a Modified HHO (MHHO) that integrates three synergistic mechanisms: (i) Leader-Guided Perching (LGP), which introduces leader bias during exploration to accelerate movement toward promising regions; (ii) an Adaptive Deception Factor (ADF), which dynamically scales Lévy-flight intensity to escape deceptive local optima; and (iii) a Hierarchical Attack Strategy (HAS), which replaces the hard besiege phase with a mentor-guided exploitation step to mitigate swarm clumping and refine local search. A dual-domain evaluation was conducted. In Experiment Series 1, MHHO statistically outperformed the standard HHO on 18 of 23 benchmark functions, at the expected cost of higher computational time. In Experiment Series 2, involving wrapper-based FS on 15 medical datasets, MHHO achieved higher mean classification accuracy on most datasets while exhibiting enhanced stability, resulting in a favorable accuracy–sparsity trade-off through minimal yet high-performing feature subsets. Friedman’s test confirmed a significant global difference (p = 0.0013), and Holm’s post-hoc analysis verified that LGP, ADF, and HAS each contribute significant improvements over standard HHO. Overall, MHHO ranked among the top performers on approximately half of the evaluated benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness as a robust and accurate optimizer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.