Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

DeepSentRec: a deep learning-based sentiment-aware product recommendation system.

Siva Rama Prasad Kollu, Yugandhar Garapati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siva Rama Prasad KolluResearch Scholar, Department of CSE, GITAM Deemed to be University, Hyderabad, India. kollusivaramaprasad@gmail.com.
Yugandhar GarapatiSenior Member IEEE, Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, GITAM Deemed to be University, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality user experience improvements across e-commerce or content platforms are inherent in recommender systems. Traditional recommendation approaches, such as collaborative filtering (CF) and content-based filtering (CBF), are typically grounded only in user-item interaction data and often neglect the valuable semantic and sentimental knowledge embedded in user review data. Unfortunately, that limits how personalised and engaging it can be. In recent years, sentiment-aware recommendation has seen significant development. However, these models essentially combine sentiment information in shallow, static representations that fail to support adaptive personalisation and capture deep semantics. To overcome these limitations, in this paper, we propose a deep learning based sentiment-aware product recommendation system, namely DeepSentRec, that tightly integrates sentiment analysis, hybrid filtering and reinforcement learning. SentimentBERT is employed to obtain fine-grained sentiments from review texts, and HybridCF-SBERT combines collaborative and semantic content-based similarities. RLRanker-PPO, a reinforcement learning-based component, adaptively ranks recommended items based on user engagement behaviours. Such a three-step architecture enables strong, dynamic, and personalised product recommendations. The proposed system has been evaluated on four publicly available datasets: Amazon Reviews, Yelp Dataset, IMDB Sentiment Dataset, and Kaggle E-Commerce Reviews. Our method achieves 91.12% precision, 85.49% recall, 89.66% NDCG, and 24.96% CTR, significantly outperforming SOTA baselines. Experimental results demonstrate that DeepSentRec improves recommendation accuracy and increases user satisfaction and activity. Highly Modular & Adaptive in Nature — Diverse & high potential to accelerate and benefit from end-use across diverse domains, essentially a way of being a next-generation intelligent recommendation framework.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHybrid FilteringProduct RecommendationReinforcement LearningSentiment Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41912685
PMCPMC13039467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.