Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Distinct social network structures and their cognitive and psychological correlates.

Lucas J Hamilton, Siyun Peng, Max E Coleman, Liana G Apostolova, Anne C Krendl, Brea L Perry

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas J HamiltonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. lucas.hamilton@augie.edu.
Siyun PengDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Max E ColemanDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Liana G ApostolovaDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Anne C KrendlDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Brea L PerryDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD)U24AG021886 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI TATIANA M. FOROUD · 2002 to 2026
$119.8M
Early Onset AD Consortium - the LEAD Study (LEADS)U01AG057195 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI APOSTOLOVA, LIANA G, CARRILLO, MARIA C · 2018 to 2023
$70.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072976 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ANDREW J SAYKIN · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease ConsortiumR56AG057195 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI APOSTOLOVA, LIANA G, CARRILLO, MARIA C · 2017 to 2017
$7.7M
Understanding how social connectedness protects older adults' cognitive health: the role of social cognitionR01AG070931 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KRENDL, ANNE CATHERINE, PERRY, BREA LOUISE · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
Leveraging Neuroimaging Biomarkers to Understand the Role of Social Networks in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG057739 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI APOSTOLOVA, LIANA G, PERRY, BREA LOUISE · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Social Networks in Alzheimer Disease 2.0.R37AG057739 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PERRY, BREA LOUISE · 2024 to 2025
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057739NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070931NIA NIH HHS R37 AG057739NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057195NIA NIH HHS U01 AG057195NIA NIH HHS U24 AG021886NIH HHS R01AG057739NIH HHS R01AG070931NIH HHS R56/U01 AG057195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social connectedness promotes healthy aging and is associated with lower risk for psychological disorders and cognitive decline. However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying these relationships, and whether different network features are associated with unique health benefits. We used comprehensive data from 386 community-dwelling older adults with and without cognitive impairment to test the relationship between psychological and cognitive function and their personal social networks. Data were collected using a multisite sampling strategy, and included detailed social network interviews and comprehensive measures of episodic memory, executive function, and language. Longitudinal effects were evaluated using a subsample at high-risk for decline, having either at least one copy of APOE ε4 or a current diagnosis of impairment (n = 118; average first follow-up = 2.28 years). Having smaller, affectively closer, and tightly connected social networks (i.e., social bonding) was modestly associated with positive psychological health. However, larger networks that contained weak ties, were more diverse with respect to social roles, and were less dense (i.e., social bridging) demonstrated robust effects on cognition. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated a sustained relationship between social bridging and cognition. Different kinds of social networks, reflecting distinct social mechanisms, may be associated with psychological and cognitive health.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionSocial NetworkingAgedAged, 80 and overExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMemory, EpisodicSocial GroupSocial SupportCognitionMental healthNetwork analysisSocial connectedness

Identifiers

PMID41912683
PMCPMC13039340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.