ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in treating hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer-comparing real-world outcomes in England to the MONARCH-2 trial.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond borders: advancing oncology trials.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbemaciclib plus fulvestrant was approved in Europe following publication of the MONARCH-2 trial and recommended to enter the NICE Cancer Drugs Fund for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. We aimed to assess MONARCH-2 generalisability to England clinical practice using real-world NHS trust data.
methodsWe identified patients receiving abemaciclib plus fulvestrant from April to December 2019 in the NHS England Blueteq and Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data, with follow-up to March 2024. We calculated overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation until death, and treatment-free survival (TFS) and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) from initiation until post-discontinuation treatment or death (restricting CFS to chemotherapy). We measured outcomes using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared to MONARCH-2.
resultsMedian OS was 25.9 months [95% CI: 23.7, 28.4] (N = 876), compared to 46.7 months (N = 446) in MONARCH-2. Differences in gender, age and performance status did not explain OS differences. Median TFS was 11.6 months [95% CI: 10.3, 12.5] compared to a median PFS of 16.9 months in MONARCH-2. Median CFS was 15.3 months [95% CI: 13.8, 16.7], compared to 25.5 months in MONARCH-2. DISCUSSION: MONARCH-2 trial data are not generalisable to this real-world cohort, which had notably shorter OS, TFS and CFS that could not be explained by differences in measured patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.