ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Natural menopause, menarche and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers: a Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe influence of age at menarche (AAM) and age at natural menopause (ANM) on breast cancer (BC) risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant (PV) carriers is uncertain. Observational studies are prone to bias and have limited statistical power. Mendelian randomization (MR) minimises bias and may be used to examine causal effects.
methodsTwo-sample and age-specific MR analyses for BC were performed. For AAM, two-sample multivariable MR and mediation analyses to account for the confounding effect of body mass index (BMI), were undertaken.
resultsGenetic scores for ANM and AAM predicted the respective traits in PV carriers. Inverse-variance weighted hazard ratios (HR) for genetically predicted ANM per-year were HR = 0.99 (95%CI:0.97-1.01, p = 0.45) and HR = 1.04 (95% CI:1.01-1.06, p = 0.003) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers, respectively. After adjusting for genetic associations with BMI, AAM per-year on BC risk were HR = 0.90 (95%CI:0.83-0.98, p = 0.01) and HR = 0.95 (95%CI:0.86-1.04, p = 0.26) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, respectively, consistent with a protective effect of later AAM. DISCUSSION: MR analyses support causal associations between ANM and BC risk in BRCA2, but not BRCA1, and between AAM and BC risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers. These results may aid risk prediction models and genetic counselling of carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.