Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912660›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Comparative analysis of immunogenicity of Chinese MMR and MR vaccines following primary vaccination in infants in Gansu Province.

Xue-Feng Liang, Xiao-Shu Zhang, Jing An, Yu Tang

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xue-Feng LiangImmunization Planning and Management Institute, Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Xiao-Shu ZhangImmunization Planning and Management Institute, Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Jing AnImmunization Planning and Management Institute, Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Yu TangImmunization Planning and Management Institute, Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China. 295415412@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically compare the immunogenicity differences between measles-mumps-rubella combined (MMR) vaccine and measles-rubella combined (MR) vaccine following first dose vaccination in 8–9-month-old infants, with emphasis on evaluating the response levels of measles, rubella and mumps-specific IgG antibody response levels induced by both vaccines, thereby providing evidence for optimized vaccine selection in China’s childhood immunization program. We conducted a randomized controlled trial enrolling 400 healthy infants aged 8–9 months from five counties and districts in Gansu Province, who were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the MMR group (n = 200) or MR group (n = 200). Venous blood samples were collected from subjects before immunization and 4–8 weeks post-vaccination. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to quantitatively detect measles-, rubella-, and mumps-specific (MMR group only) IgG antibody levels. Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Models (BGLIMM) were employed to analyze between-group differences in geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies. Antibody data were fitted using Gamma distribution; fixed effects included age in months, gender, vaccine group (MMR vs. MR), sampling time point (pre- vs. post-immunization) and days post-vaccination while random effects included individual-level effects. Model evaluation metrics included Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and effective number of parameters, with statistical inference based on 95% credible intervals (CrI) of the posterior distribution. Post-immunization, although the absolute measles IgG antibody GMC in the MR group (1338.36 IU/mL) was lower than that in the MMR group (1506.52 IU/mL), the MR group exhibited a substantially higher vaccine-induced fold-increase from baseline (248-fold vs. 200-fold). BGLIMM indicated that the increase in measles antibodies (GMC) was approximately 34% higher in the MR group compared to the MMR group (β = 0.29, 95% CrI: 0.08 to 0.49, corresponding to a GMC ratio of 1.34). No meaningful difference was observed in rubella IgG antibody GMCs between groups (31.78 vs. 26.67 IU/mL, fold-increase 29-fold vs. 22-fold, β = 0.01, 95% CrI: −0.13 to 0.16). Mumps IgG antibody GMCs in the MMR group was 164.37 U/mL (95% CrI: 145.13 to 186.16). Fixed-effects analysis revealed immunogenicity differences among the three antigens: measles (β = 5.12) > rubella (β = 3.26) > mumps (β = 2.61). Random-effects variance analysis demonstrated that inter-individual response heterogeneity exhibited substantial differences across antigens, with measles antibody showing the greatest inter-individual variability (precision for ID = 1.63, 95% CrI: 1.33–2.00), followed by rubella (precision = 3.56, 95% CrI: 2.83–4.43), and mumps showing the least (precision = 11.02, 95% CrI: 6.52–18.07). Both MMR and MR vaccines induce effective immune responses in 8–9-month-old infants; however, the MR vaccine demonstrates superior measles antibody responses compared to the MMR vaccine, consistent with established evidence that antibody responses tend to decrease as vaccine valency increases. These findings provide high-quality clinical evidence to inform vaccine selection and optimization in China’s childhood immunization program, suggesting that MR vaccine may be considered as an alternative for the first dose when maximizing measles antibody response is prioritized.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles VaccineAntibodies, ViralChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfantMaleMumpsRubellaVaccinationVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles VaccineVaccines, Combinedantibody responseBayesian analysisGMC ratioimmunogenicityMMR vaccineMR vaccinevaccine valency

Identifiers

PMID41912660
PMCPMC13039495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.