Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Key barriers and solutions for decarbonizing Egypt's construction sector.

Sara Harb, Ibrahim S Abotaleb, A Samer Ezeldin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara HarbDepartment of Construction Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt. saraharb@aucegypt.edu.
Ibrahim S AbotalebDepartment of Construction Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt.
A Samer EzeldinDepartment of Construction Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decarbonization in the construction industry demands a cyclical, collaborative approach involving architects, engineers, material suppliers, contractors, and clients. Each stakeholder plays a pivotal role in fostering continuous innovation and improvement to reduce the industry's carbon footprint. Despite increasing attention on low-carbon materials and sustainable practices, the construction sector remains a significant source of emissions. Existing research often overlooks the unique challenges faced by developing countries like Egypt, failing to address key barriers or align them with actionable and context-specific solutions. The goal of this research is to identify and analyze the financial, technological, and regulatory challenges obstructing decarbonization efforts in the construction sector. To address this, the research bridges this gap through a comprehensive, multistep methodology. Initially, an industry survey was conducted with the following objectives: (1) identifying and prioritizing 32 barriers to decarbonization; (2) providing a clear prioritization of these challenges by evaluating their significance and impact on the decarbonization process; (3) collecting and analyzing rankings to understand who stakeholders believe should take the lead on carbon reduction; and (4) exploring stakeholders' priorities and perspectives, focusing on understanding their views on barriers and potential solutions. Second, different statistical analysis tests and methods (i.e., internal, and external reliability, statistically significant differences, evaluation metrics, clustering analysis, and heatmap analysis) were employed to analyze the results and draw conclusions. Based on a total of 125 responses and 32 decarbonization barriers, the findings reflected that the top three barriers adversely affecting decarbonization construction projects included: (1) perception of higher construction costs; (2) limited market which prioritizes cost and speed over reducing embodied carbon; and (3) high initial investment costs for low-carbon technologies. Barriers were categorized into three clusters based on criticality, with 56% requiring immediate action. This study not only ranks barriers but also aligns them with actionable solutions, offering insights to guide decision-makers, researchers, and practitioners. It provides a roadmap for overcoming decarbonization challenges and advancing sustainable construction practices in Egypt.

Identifiers

PMID41912633
PMCPMC13039379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.