ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancement of CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aerogels for Carbon Dioxide Capture: Classification Design, Preparation Strategies, and Capture Scenarios.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, surface modification of a general purpose activated carbon is achieved through impregnation of three common amino acids namely, glycine, serine and lysine for CO2 adsorption in post-combustion processes at temperature range 298–358 K. Glycine, due to its smaller molecular size, higher nitrogen content, and enhanced pore accessibility caused the adsorption to increase by 25% compared to original activated carbon uptake. N2 adsorption isotherms were measured to comparatively evaluate adsorption preference and infer potential CO2/N2 selectivity. The modified adsorbents with glycine exhibited similar N2 uptake to initial activated carbon at 358 K. All adsorbents exhibited physisorption behavior, with isosteric heat of adsorption values ranging from − 11 to − 33.9 kJ/mol for CO2 and − 15.6 to − 17.8 kJ/mol for N2. Overall, the results demonstrate that functionalizing by glycine, significantly enhances CO2 adsorption capacity of activated carbon. These findings provide valuable insights for designing tailored adsorbents for post combustion CO2 capture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.