Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning prediction of common bile duct stones using synthetic data to guide emergency ERCP decisions.

Sungmin Kang, Namyoung Park, Il Sang Shin, Eunsoo Lee, Sieun Choi, Jiyun Jung, Jun Kyu Lee, Yun Nah Lee, Jong Ho Moon, Kwang Ro Joo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sungmin Kang *Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Namyoung Park *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Il Sang Shin *Digestive Disease Center and Research InstituteDepartment of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Eunsoo LeeDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sieun ChoiDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiyun JungDepartment of Biostatistics, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Jun Kyu LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Yun Nah LeeDigestive Disease Center and Research InstituteDepartment of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Jong Ho MoonDigestive Disease Center and Research InstituteDepartment of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Ro JooDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihie KimDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jihie.kim@dgu.edu.
Joo Seong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. lastpromise0@hanmail.net.

Funding

Institute for Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation IITP-2025-RS-2020-II201Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 2023-0-00049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the standard for common bile duct (CBD) stone removal. However, current guidelines often result in unnecessary procedures. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using synthetic data augmentation to improve CBD stone prediction. Electronic health records from patients with suspected CBD stones were analyzed from three independent tertiary centers (733 patients for internal validation, 348 for external validation). A large language model (LLM) generated curated synthetic data to augment the training dataset. The ExtraTrees classifier was selected after evaluating multiple algorithms. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. The model incorporated 11 routinely available variables and achieved an AUROC of 0.982 (95% CI 0.952-1.000) in internal validation and 0.957 (95% CI 0.937-0.974) in external validation. Compared to existing clinical guidelines, the model substantially reduced unnecessary ERCPs (0% vs 11.9-22.9% in internal validation; 6.7% vs 29.2-35.9% in external validation) while maintaining low false-negative rates (17.6% vs 28.2-45.6% in external validation). Calibration curves demonstrated good alignment between predicted and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis confirmed greater net clinical benefit than existing guidelines. Feature importance analysis identified CBD dilatation ≥ 10 mm as the most influential predictor, followed by liver function parameters. This machine learning model, enhanced by LLM-generated synthetic data, significantly outperformed existing clinical guidelines for CBD stone prediction. The model provides a practical risk stratification tool using routinely available emergency department variables and may reduce unnecessary ERCP procedures while maintaining diagnostic safety.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGallstonesMachine LearningAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsROC CurveCommon bile duct stoneEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyMachine learningPrediction modelSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID41912591
PMCPMC13039182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.