Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912580›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Explainable machine learning of PROGRESS-Plus social factors predicts cognitive trajectories after traumatic brain injury.

Jingwen Xu, Urooba Shaikh, Thaisa Tylinski Sant'Ana, Tatyana Mollayeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingwen Xu *KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3290-5602
Urooba Shaikh *KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9795-3972
Thaisa Tylinski Sant'AnaKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8889-2112
Tatyana MollayevaKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. tatyana.mollayeva@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-1848

Funding

Canada Research Chairs CRC-2021-00074CIHR 202306BK5-510306-BKS-ADHD-220229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific research on social parameters for prognosis after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is evolving, yet results remain heterogeneous, and predictors for risk stratification are lacking. To understand how social parameters are linked to cognitive outcomes after TBI, we applied machine learning (ML) algorithms using cohort-level data from 30 published studies including 2,364 participants with TBI (72% male; 55% mild, 45% moderate-severe injury). We extracted and harmonised longitudinal data following the PROGRESS-Plus framework, and used the data as predictors of rate of change in cognition post-TBI. We developed random forest, gradient boosting (GB), and extreme GB predictive models, accounting for time from injury to baseline assessment, time between assessments, and country-level structural indicators. We used mean absolute error and root mean squared error to evaluate model performance, and Shapley Additive Explanations analysis for explanatory model predictions. Results highlighted time interval, country-level structural indicators, age, and variation in education as key predictors for rate of change for both injury severities. Sensitivity analyses for predicting rate of change in executive function and learning and memory confirmed the robustness of the results. Our work contributes to novel ML meta-research for understanding prognosis and advancing precision in predicting cognitive outcomes after TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticCognitionMachine LearningAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestArtificial intelligenceCommon data elementsData harmonizationEvidence gapInformation managementSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41912580
PMCPMC13039392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.