ArticleScientific reports2026
High-fidelity numerical framework for crashworthiness evaluation of passenger car body structures under full-frontal impact.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frontal collisions are among the most severe crash modes, requiring robust front-end design to ensure occupant safety. High-fidelity finite element (FE) simulations play a crucial role in evaluating energy absorption, intrusion patterns, and crash pulse fidelity during early vehicle design. This study develops and validates a high-fidelity finite-element model of a passenger-car BIW subjected to a 64 km/h full-frontal impact, addressing those limitations. The proposed framework couples global crash metrics energy balance, deceleration pulse, intrusion, and sectional forces with spatial plastic-strain mapping using shotgun plots to evaluate localized deformation behavior. Validation was performed against NCAP crash data and published finite-element models, showing close agreement: peak deceleration = 32 g (–1.5% error), pulse duration = 87 ms (–3.3%), and toe-pan intrusion = 123 mm (+ 2.5%). More than 92% of the initial kinetic energy was absorbed as internal plastic work with total energy balance error < 5%, confirming numerical stability. Shotgun analysis indicated that 68% of crash-box elements and 54% of front-rail elements exceeded the 0.15 strain threshold, identifying dominant energy-absorbing regions. The framework provides a reproducible, simulation-only approach for assessing crashworthiness and structural optimization without requiring experimental testing. The methodology can be readily extended to multi-condition crash scenarios and lightweight design applications, offering a cost-effective foundation for predictive safety evaluation in next-generation vehicle architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.