ArticleNature communications2026
Deep homology and design of proteasome chaperone proteins in Candidozyma auris.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep homology and design of proteasome chaperone proteins in Candidozyma auris.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central tenet of biology is that protein structure mediates the sequence-function relationship. Recently, there has been excitement about the promise of advances in protein structure modeling to generate hypotheses about sequence-structure-function relationships. Here, we leverage structural similarity to identify rapidly evolving proteasome assembly chaperones and characterize their function in Candidozyma (Candida) auris. Despite extensive sequence divergence, we demonstrate conservation of function, corroborating that specific folds, and not sequences, are required for function. This theoretical premise suggests that protein structures with certain properties should be functionally interchangeable, even if they were not products of a common evolutionary history. To reduce this theory to practice, we performed structure-informed protein design, exploring sequence space that is not accessible via stepwise evolution, and mutated more than 40 residues in the Poc4 proteasome assembly chaperone to demonstrate that artificial proteins can rescue complex biological processes in the context of the whole cell. This sequence-structure-function relationship expands our ability to use structure to identify deep evolutionary relationships between proteins and generate hypotheses about gene function in non-model organisms. Overall, this helps to define and understand functional constraints on protein evolution, with important implications for both future protein design and retrospective function prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.