ArticleBlood cancer journal2026
Revised criteria for light chain MGUS enhance diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light Chain Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: Diagnosis, Biology, and Clinical Management.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (LC-MGUS) is an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM) and related disorders defined by abnormal free light chain (FLC) testing. Recently, revised FLC reference intervals were proposed by the iStopMM study group. We evaluated their performance in a large population-based cohort. MGUS cases were identified from the Danish Lymphoid Cancer Research (DALY-CARE) data resource, including only individuals with Freelite FLC-measurements. Cases were classified by original and revised LC-MGUS criteria, hereby identifying cases only fulfilling original but not revised criteria (reclassified as normal). Outcomes were progression to MM or related disorders. Cumulative incidence of progression with death as competing risk was examined using Aalen-Johansen estimation. Annual progression risk was assessed using a person-years approach. In total, 360 individuals classified by original criteria, 215 by revised, while 150 (40%) were reclassified as normal. In the revised group, there were 21 (9.8%) progressions; 11 (5.1%) to MM and seven (3.3%) to AL amyloidosis. Only two individuals (1.3%) progressed in the reclassified group, none to MM or AL amyloidosis. For revised LC-MGUS, the 2- and 5-year cumulative incidence of progression was 5.8% and 8.9%, respectively, with an annual progression rate of 3%. This study validates the performance of the iStopMM revised LC-MGUS criteria in a clinical cohort. Applying the revised criteria reduced LC-MGUS diagnoses by 40% without missing cases progressing to MM or AL amyloidosis. These findings confirm the accuracy of the revised criteria and support their implementation to improve diagnostics and ensure follow-up of individuals truly at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.