Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912495›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2026

Revised criteria for light chain MGUS enhance diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification.

Lærke Sloth Andersen, Cecilie Velsø Mæng, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson, Thórir Einarsson Long, Christian Brieghel, Emil Hermansen, Morten Nørgaard Andersen, Kirsten Grønbæk, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lærke Sloth AndersenDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. laerke.sloth.andersen@regionh.dk.ORCID 0009-0001-6878-8602
Cecilie Velsø MængDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7205-9330
Sæmundur RögnvaldssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-8414
Thórir Einarsson LongDepartment of Nephrology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2377-7886
Christian BrieghelDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-8106
Emil HermansenDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-5336
Morten Nørgaard AndersenDepartment of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirsten GrønbækDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-9601
Carsten Utoft NiemannDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-5242
Sigurður Yngvi KristinssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-4964-7476
Sigrún ThorsteinsdóttirDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (LC-MGUS) is an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM) and related disorders defined by abnormal free light chain (FLC) testing. Recently, revised FLC reference intervals were proposed by the iStopMM study group. We evaluated their performance in a large population-based cohort. MGUS cases were identified from the Danish Lymphoid Cancer Research (DALY-CARE) data resource, including only individuals with Freelite FLC-measurements. Cases were classified by original and revised LC-MGUS criteria, hereby identifying cases only fulfilling original but not revised criteria (reclassified as normal). Outcomes were progression to MM or related disorders. Cumulative incidence of progression with death as competing risk was examined using Aalen-Johansen estimation. Annual progression risk was assessed using a person-years approach. In total, 360 individuals classified by original criteria, 215 by revised, while 150 (40%) were reclassified as normal. In the revised group, there were 21 (9.8%) progressions; 11 (5.1%) to MM and seven (3.3%) to AL amyloidosis. Only two individuals (1.3%) progressed in the reclassified group, none to MM or AL amyloidosis. For revised LC-MGUS, the 2- and 5-year cumulative incidence of progression was 5.8% and 8.9%, respectively, with an annual progression rate of 3%. This study validates the performance of the iStopMM revised LC-MGUS criteria in a clinical cohort. Applying the revised criteria reduced LC-MGUS diagnoses by 40% without missing cases progressing to MM or AL amyloidosis. These findings confirm the accuracy of the revised criteria and support their implementation to improve diagnostics and ensure follow-up of individuals truly at risk.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin Light ChainsMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentImmunoglobulin Light Chains

Identifiers

PMID41912495
PMCPMC13039883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.