ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Brain network localization of anhedonia.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anhedonia, encompassing a broad spectrum of deficits in reward processing, is highly prevalent in major depressive disorder (MDD) and constitutes one of its core symptoms. While substantial progress has recently been made in mapping neuropsychiatric symptoms to specific brain networks, focused efforts to examine network localization of anhedonia are limited. We initially synthesized extant neuroimaging literature to identify brain locations with structural or functional alterations related to anhedonia. By integrating these affected brain locations with large-scale discovery (1113 healthy individuals) and validation (1093 healthy individuals and 255 MDD patients) resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets, we then applied novel functional connectivity network mapping to construct an anhedonia network. The anhedonia network was composed of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula, lateral prefrontal cortex, and striatum, principally implicating the canonical ventral attention and subcortical networks. Further analyses revealed that the trait and state anhedonia networks preferentially involved the default and limbic networks respectively, in addition to the commonly affected ventral attention and subcortical networks. Our findings may not only advance the understanding of the neurobiology underlying anhedonia from a network perspective, but also potentially contribute to more targeted and effective intervention strategies for anhedonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.