ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026
Rationale and Design of the MIA Trial: A Proof-of-Concept Study of Minimally Invasive Autopsy in an Infectious Cause of Death in a Scandinavian ICU Setting.
Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It remains a challenge to obtain well-preserved tissue samples from deceased patients as access to regular autopsy is limited. Minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is a potential alternative to the complete diagnostic autopsy because of its efficacy in providing non-autolyzed tissue samples and its increased acceptability amongst the bereaved. The study follows an exploratory, prospective design without any kind of intervention. Inclusion criteria are deceased adults (≥ 18 years), confirmed signs of death, uncertain or multifactorial cause of death, present or previous infection, and permission from next of kin to perform MIA, defined by ultrasound (US)-guided samples from the heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys using a TruCut semi-automatic coaxial needle (14G; 16 cm length). Tissue samples, fixed in BiopSafe 20 mL formalin test tubes, are sent for pathological evaluation. The primary outcome is the achievement of well-preserved tissue samples, representative of the target organ and suitable for histopathological evaluation and diagnosis. An exploratory outcome is to establish the degree of clinico-pathological discrepancies between pre-mortem clinical status and post-mortem pathological descriptions. This investigator-initiated study is designed to validate the feasibility of MIA to enable fast-track post-mortem evaluation in an ICU environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.