Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912215›Full record

ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2026

Internet and Social Media Use Among Patients with Hair and Scalp Disorders: A Behavioral Analysis.

Edwine Coulanges, Christine Olagun-Samuel, Jamon Thomas, Prince Adotama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edwine CoulangesMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta.
Christine Olagun-SamuelRonald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Jamon ThomasHoward University College of Medicine, College of Medicine, Washington.
Prince AdotamaRonald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTikTok, a social media platform, is a tool for disseminating dermatological public health education. On TikTok, like other social media platforms, both board-certified dermatologists and non-medical providers ("influencers") provide dermatological advice, but how the quality of the advice compares between the two creator groups is unclear.

objectivesThis study sought to assess similarities and differences in the language used within content, user receptibility, and engagement and the utility of online education in understanding hair and scalp disorders.

methodsA cross-sectional analysis of 97 TikTok videos from 2023 was performed to evaluate the content quality of videos made by dermatologists and influencers regarding three common hair and scalp disorders: seborrheic dermatitis, telogen effluvium, and traction alopecia.

resultsDermatologists and influencers had similar user engagement, but 49% of dermatologists were more likely to recommend standard treatments compared to 27% of influencers; 46% of influencers were more likely to recommend alternative treatment options compared to 25% of dermatologists. An analysis of user comments to assess audience understanding indicated that the three disorders were often confused with at least 2-3 other similar hair and scalp conditions.

conclusionsThis study highlights a need to clarify for patients the standard of care for common hair and scalp disorders. This study also identified a universal lack of messaging encouraging users to seek in-person medical attention for their dermatological concerns.

Identifiers

PMID41912215
PMCPMC12952882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.