Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912210›Full record

ReviewDermatology practical & conceptual2026

Topical Tacrolimus for Lichen Sclerosus: Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Bhagyshree Patel, Ayesha Lala, Roberto Verdolini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhagyshree PatelSt Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Ayesha LalaSt Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Roberto VerdoliniSt Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting both genital and extragenital sites, with a prevalence of approximately 3% among females in the United Kingdom, particularly in the post-menopausal population. Although its etiology remains incompletely understood, LS can significantly impair quality of life through pain, pruritus, and scarring. Current guidelines recommend potent topical corticosteroids, most commonly clobetasol, as first-line therapy; however, long-term use is limited by adverse effects such as skin atrophy.

objectivesThis systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus in the management of lichen sclerosus.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen randomized controlled trials comprising 335 patients with lichen sclerosus were included.

resultsOf the included patients, 2% (N=6) presented with extragenital disease and 98% (N=331) with anogenital involvement. Most patients (81%, N=272) were treated with topical tacrolimus 0.1% twice daily, while 19% (N=63) received clobetasol as a comparator. Clinical improvement, ranging from partial symptom relief to complete remission, was observed in 90% (N=244) of tacrolimustreated patients. Severe adverse events requiring discontinuation were rare (1%, N=3). Compared with corticosteroids, tacrolimus was associated with superior patient-reported outcomes, clinician-reported improvement, and histological response.

conclusionTopical tacrolimus appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for lichen sclerosus, demonstrating favorable clinical and histological outcomes with minimal adverse effects. Further long-term prospective trials are needed to confirm its comparative efficacy, safety, and role in future treatment guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID41912210
PMCPMC12952874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.