ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2026
Digital Health Behavior in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Internet and Social Media Use Patterns.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a prevalent dermatological condition leading to frequent visits to primary care, emergency departments, and dermatology clinics worldwide. Its chronic relapsing nature, accompanied by angioedema, shortness of breath, and intense pruritus, drives patients to seek information and treatment.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate CSU patients' Internet usage habits, including their search terms, trusted sources, and whether they share this information with their physicians.
methodsA survey was conducted among 80 patients at a tertiary hospital's urticaria outpatient clinic. Data collected included sociodemographic characteristics, urticaria activity scores, dermatology life quality indexes, and Internet and social media usage patterns related to CSU.
resultsOf the 80 patients, 73.8% had researched CSU online, with significantly higher usage among younger, single patients with lower educational levels and shorter disease duration. Google was the most used platform (84.7%), followed by Instagram and YouTube (25.4% each). General information about CSU was the primary search term (76.3%). Notably, 21.3% attempted to contact doctors via social media, a behavior less common among patients using omalizumab. Approximately 75% did not share their findings with their physicians. Additionally, 58.8% expressed a desire for dermatologists to provide more online information about CSU.
conclusionsCSU patients frequently research their condition online but often conceal this from their doctors. Attempts to contact physicians via social media were lower among omalizumab users, possibly due to regular follow-ups. Enhancing dermatological follow-up and online educational resources could improve patient engagement and treatment adherence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.