ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2026
Treatment Outcomes of Triamcinolone Acetonide Compared with Cryotherapy in Alopecia Areata: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune hair loss disorder. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (IL-TAC) and cryotherapy are both used for patchy AA, but their comparative efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated.
objectivesThe primary objective was to compare the efficacy of IL-TAC versus cryotherapy in achieving ≥50% hair regrowth in patchy AA. Secondary objectives included comparing safety profiles and conducting subgroup analyses.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis per PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251036356). Databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Google Scholar) were searched up to April 2025. Comparative studies of patients with patchy AA receiving IL-TAC or cryotherapy were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2 and ROBINS-I tools. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the primary outcome.
results640 patients across five trials were included. Sensitivity analysis of four studies demonstrated IL-TAC significantly increased the likelihood of ≥50% hair regrowth compared to cryotherapy (RR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.36-1.81, *p*<0.001), with low heterogeneity (I
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests IL-TAC is more effective than cryotherapy for significant hair regrowth in patchy AA, though both have distinct tolerability profiles. These findings support IL-TAC as a first-line procedural option, with cryotherapy remaining a viable alternative. Higher-quality comparative trials with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.