Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912020›Full record

ArticleChemico-biological interactions2026

Comparative 28-day mouse study of topically applied aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands: microbiota-derived indoles, therapeutic tapinarof, pollutants 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and diesel exhaust particles.

Subhash Solanki, Syeda Mashnia Tasnim, Lauren L Thompson, Madhusudhan Alle, Brandon Ward, Andrzej T Slominski, Zorica Janjetovic, Teresa Jozwicka, Patrycja Erdmańska, Deborah Minzaghi and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chemico-biological interactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Subhash SolankiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: subhashsolankhi@gmail.com.
Syeda Mashnia TasnimDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: mashnia.tasnim@gmail.com.
Lauren L ThompsonIntegrated Microscopy Center, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: lthmps10@memphis.edu.
Madhusudhan AlleDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: allemadhusudhan@gmail.com.
Brandon WardDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: bward4349@gmail.com.
Andrzej T SlominskiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. Electronic address: aslominski@uabmc.edu.
Zorica JanjetovicDepartment of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. Electronic address: zjanjetovic@uabmc.edu.
Teresa JozwickaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100, Torun, Poland. Electronic address: teresa.jozwicka@cm.umk.pl.
Patrycja ErdmańskaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100, Torun, Poland. Electronic address: patrycja.e55@gmail.com.
Deborah MinzaghiDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: Deborah.Minzaghi@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Carrie Hayes SutterDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: csutter@memphis.edu.
Elizabeth A GriceDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: egrice@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Thomas R SutterDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Electronic address: tsutter@memphis.edu.

Funding

Study Design and Data AnalysisP30AR069589 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Cellular Determinants of AH Receptor SignalingR01ES017014 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI THOMAS R SUTTER · 2010 to 2026
$4.3M
Microbial regulation of the keratinocyte AHRR01AR079856 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice, THOMAS R SUTTER · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069589NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079856NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) regulates skin responses to microbial, therapeutic, and pollutant ligands. While AHR activation has been linked to both the etiology and treatment of skin diseases, the comparative effects of distinct ligand classes remain understudied. Here we evaluated systemic and cutaneous effects of different AHR ligands applied topically for 28 days. C57BL/6J mice were treated with microbiota-derived indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPY 1%), indole-3-aldehyde (IAld 0.01%), therapeutic, tapinarof (TAP 1%), and pollutants, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD 0.000003% (high) or 0.0000003% (low)] or diesel exhaust particle (DEP 0.1%). Systemic effects, skin condition and atopic dermatitis- and chloracne-like outcomes were assessed. Only high-dose TCDD resulted in minor systemic effects including early signs of hepatic injury. While DEP worsened the overall skin condition index, transepidermal water loss, ear thickness, scratching and grooming were unchanged for all chemicals. Both TAP and high-dose TCDD elevated desquamation and produced chloracne-like pathology characterized by hyperkeratosis, sebaceous gland involution and cyst-formation. TCDD caused epidermal atrophy, whereas TAP caused epidermal hyperplasia, infundibular dilatation and extended hyperkeratosis. TAP and high-dose TCDD were equally effective in increasing Cyp1a1 and Cyp1b1 mRNA, yet TAP preferentially increased Nrf2 targets, Epgn, Sprr2d, and Slpi, previously reported to drive a chloracne-like response in mice. Human keratinocytes showed similar preferential induction of EPGN and SPRR2D by TAP. These findings highlight AHR activator-specific skin effects, in part, associated with differences in selective ligand activation of modifying signaling pathways.

Indexed as

IndolesMicrobiotaPolychlorinated DibenzodioxinsReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonAnimalsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1FemaleLigandsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSkinCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1indole-3-carbaldehydeIndolesLigandsPolychlorinated DibenzodioxinsReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonAryl hydrocarbon receptorChloracneDioxinIndole-3-aldehydeIndole-3-pyruvic acidNRF2Tapinarof

Identifiers

PMID41912020
PMCPMC13078164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.