Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911918›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.

Giobbe Forni, Giuseppe Fusco, Filippo Nicolini, Heather Bruce, Andrea Luchetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giobbe ForniDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, via F. Selmi 3, Bologna, 40126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-8693
Giuseppe FuscoDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/b, Padova, 35131, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4690-6049
Filippo NicoliniDivision of Genetics and Genome Biology, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Leicester, University Rd., Leicester, LE1 7HR, UK.
Heather BruceDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, #3051 - 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-8224
Andrea LuchettiDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, via F. Selmi 3, Bologna, 40126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-721X

Funding

This work has been funded by Canziani Funding to AL.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The irreversibility of complex trait loss has long been a tenet of evolutionary biology. However, this idea is increasingly at odds with the numerous documented exceptions across the Tree of Life. We synthesise this growing body of evidence across a diverse array of taxa and traits, exploring the evolutionary conditions that enable evolutionary reversal. By integrating macroevolutionary, genetic, and developmental information, we argue that trait reversal is commonly fostered by some form of persistence in the generative developmental pathway of the lost trait. We identify three overarching modes of trait reversal and support them with multiple case studies: by pleiotropy (the involvement of the same generative components in other traits and/or functions), by plasticity (environment-dependent expression of the trait) and by hemiplasy (persistence in another lineage, followed by reticulate evolution). We also examine important affinities between trait reversal and evolutionary novelties, undermining a neat distinction between what is old and what is new in evolution. This survey may provide a useful framework for future explorations of the developmental mechanisms underlying these still overlooked macroevolutionary dynamics.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhenotypeAnimalsGenetic PleiotropyDollo's lawgene regulatory networkhemiplasyplasticitypleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID41911918
PMCPMC13542362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.