ArticlePoultry science2026
Preference and behavioral responses to synbiotic supplementation via drinking water in laying hens under social stress.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synbiotics (SYN) have the potential to enhance animal health, but their efficacy depends on both biological impact and voluntary intake, particularly under stress, when hydration and gut support are critical. This study presents the first investigation of SYN supplementation delivered exclusively through drinking water in laying hens, evaluating both preference and behavioral responses, particularly feather pecking, during a period of social stress induced by repeated mixing of unfamiliar birds. A total of 226 White Leghorn hens (37 weeks old) were housed in enriched floor pens with simultaneous access to color-coded SYN-enriched and plain water containers. Following a 2-week associative learning phase and 1-week washout, hens entered a 6-week preference testing period encompassing pre-stress, stress, and post-stress phases. Water consumption was measured at the group level, while individual jug visits were tracked using RFID technology. Feather pecking was measured (10 min/day) and feather damage assessed according to severity. Hens showed a clear preference for SYN-enriched water, consuming significantly more than plain water (p < 0.0001). While overall intake remained stable, SYN consumption fluctuated across stress phases, with the strongest preference pre-stress and a modest decline during stress. Although hens with higher rates of severe feather pecking (SFP) visited SYN-enriched water more frequently than hens with lower rates (p = 0.0288), suggesting a potential coping mechanism, overall, SFP rates remained stable across all phases. Notably, the level of SFP observed during the pre-stress phase was already sufficient to cause progressive plumage deterioration, which continued throughout the study. The proportion of birds with severe feather damage rose from 39.4% to 53.5%, while those with intact plumage dropped from 37.6% to 19.9% over time. Thus, SYN supplementation via drinking water is feasible and preferred by laying hens, even under stress. These findings highlight the potential of nutraceuticals delivered through drinking water to influence hen behavior; however, the progressive plumage deterioration despite stable SFP rates suggests that SYN supplementation alone may be insufficient, underscoring the need for integrated management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.