Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911622›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Preference and behavioral responses to synbiotic supplementation via drinking water in laying hens under social stress.

Anna Naim, Nienke van Staaveren, Emily M Leishman, Anna Lea Nicklas, Dan Tulpan, Paul Forsythe, Alexandra Harlander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna NaimDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Nienke van StaaverenDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Emily M LeishmanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Anna Lea NicklasDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Dan TulpanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock (CGIL), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Paul ForsytheFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Alexandra HarlanderDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. Electronic address: aharland@uoguelph.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synbiotics (SYN) have the potential to enhance animal health, but their efficacy depends on both biological impact and voluntary intake, particularly under stress, when hydration and gut support are critical. This study presents the first investigation of SYN supplementation delivered exclusively through drinking water in laying hens, evaluating both preference and behavioral responses, particularly feather pecking, during a period of social stress induced by repeated mixing of unfamiliar birds. A total of 226 White Leghorn hens (37 weeks old) were housed in enriched floor pens with simultaneous access to color-coded SYN-enriched and plain water containers. Following a 2-week associative learning phase and 1-week washout, hens entered a 6-week preference testing period encompassing pre-stress, stress, and post-stress phases. Water consumption was measured at the group level, while individual jug visits were tracked using RFID technology. Feather pecking was measured (10 min/day) and feather damage assessed according to severity. Hens showed a clear preference for SYN-enriched water, consuming significantly more than plain water (p < 0.0001). While overall intake remained stable, SYN consumption fluctuated across stress phases, with the strongest preference pre-stress and a modest decline during stress. Although hens with higher rates of severe feather pecking (SFP) visited SYN-enriched water more frequently than hens with lower rates (p = 0.0288), suggesting a potential coping mechanism, overall, SFP rates remained stable across all phases. Notably, the level of SFP observed during the pre-stress phase was already sufficient to cause progressive plumage deterioration, which continued throughout the study. The proportion of birds with severe feather damage rose from 39.4% to 53.5%, while those with intact plumage dropped from 37.6% to 19.9% over time. Thus, SYN supplementation via drinking water is feasible and preferred by laying hens, even under stress. These findings highlight the potential of nutraceuticals delivered through drinking water to influence hen behavior; however, the progressive plumage deterioration despite stable SFP rates suggests that SYN supplementation alone may be insufficient, underscoring the need for integrated management strategies.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChickensStress, PsychologicalSynbioticsAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDrinking WaterFeathersFemaleDrinking Waterfeather peckingGut-brain axisMicrobiomePoultryRFID

Identifiers

PMID41911622
PMCPMC13049313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.