ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
Giant intradural intramedullary spinal ependymoma: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal ependymomas are the most common intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults but rarely span multiple vertebral segments. Giant intradural intramedullary spinal ependymomas are exceedingly rare and pose diagnostic and surgical challenges due to their size and location. OBSERVATIONS: The authors report the case of a 31-year-old female who presented with progressive neck pain, lower extremity weakness, and sensory deficits. MRI revealed a large intramedullary lesion extending 11 spinal levels from C1 to T4. Gross-total en bloc resection of a 16-cm intramedullary ependymoma was achieved via C1-T4 laminectomy with posterior midline myelotomy, guided by multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring. Pathological examination revealed a WHO grade 2 ependymoma. Postoperative MRI confirmed no residual tumor. The patient experienced transient postoperative motor deficits with gradual neurological recovery noted at follow-up. LESSONS: This case represents one of the largest reported intramedullary spinal ependymomas in the literature and demonstrates the feasibility of gross-total resection using a posterior longitudinal midline myelotomy approach. Successful management was facilitated by careful microsurgical technique and intraoperative neuromonitoring. Early recognition and timely surgical intervention are critical in optimizing outcomes in patients with spinal ependymomas; however, patients with multilevel intramedullary tumors will likely have residual neurological deficits. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25686.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.