Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911547›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Video-Based Gait Assessment Using Machine Learning to Classify Age and Sex in Low-Resource Settings: Cross-Sectional Study.

Chanchanok Aramrat, Poppy Alice Carson Mallinson, Papangkorn Inkaew, Pusit Seepheung, Nutchar Wiwatkunupakarn, Nida Buawangpong, Nick Birk, Judith Lieber, Santhi Bhogadi, Hemant Mahajan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chanchanok AramratDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-4850
Poppy Alice Carson MallinsonDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-8065
Papangkorn InkaewDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-1564
Pusit SeepheungDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0006-0155-2204
Nutchar WiwatkunupakarnDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-9498
Nida BuawangpongDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9735-2587
Nick BirkDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7938-8153
Judith LieberDepartment of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-0381
Santhi BhogadiPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-8804
Hemant MahajanNational Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-9191
Santosh Kumar BanjaraNational Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-9552
Bharati KulkarniNational Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-318X
Sanjay KinraDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-4625
Chaisiri AngkurawaranonDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-9164

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T038292/1Medical Research Council MR/V001221/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait assessment is an important tool for evaluating health risks in older adults but remains underused in low-resource settings. We explored the feasibility of using a low-cost, simple walking protocol with smartphone video capture to extract health-related gait signals by classifying sex and age. Sex and age are fundamental biological factors linked to most health- and aging-related outcomes. Establishing baseline classification performance provides justification for future exploration of more complex health-related conditions using this protocol.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether pose parameters derived from smartphone-based gait videos can be used by machine learning models to classify age and sex.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 155 participants (Thailand: n=59, 38.1%; India: n=96, 61.9%). Participants performed a simple walking protocol while being recorded using smartphones. Pose estimation was conducted using the MediaPipe algorithm to extract 109 features related to joint distances, angles, and walking speed. For feasibility assessment, we calculated the proportion of recordings for which pose estimation could be extracted. Elastic-net logistic regression and histogram-based gradient boosting classifiers were used for analysis. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Outcomes were sex (male vs female) and age group (aged<65 vs ≥65 y).

resultsPose parameters were successfully extracted from 145 (93.5%) of the 155 video recordings. Among the 145 participants, 94 (64.8%) were female, and 55 (37.9%) were aged 65 years or older. The 2 analytic models demonstrated comparable performance. Sex classification achieved a maximum mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of approximately 0.90 (SD 0.06), whereas age classification achieved a maximum mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of approximately 0.70 (SD 0.09). Classification performance was primarily influenced by the number of features used, clothing characteristics, and the quality of pose estimation.

conclusionsThis simple smartphone-based gait assessment protocol was able to extract meaningful pose parameters and classify biological features (age and sex). Further studies are warranted to evaluate its potential utility for disease screening, risk stratification, and longitudinal health monitoring.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisMachine LearningVideo RecordingAgedAge FactorsClassification AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSex FactorsSmartphoneage and sex classificationgait assessmentlow-resource settingmachine learningsmartphone video recording

Identifiers

PMID41911547
PMCPMC13077277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.