Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911476›Full record

ReviewNursing inquiry2026

From Aeromedical Evacuation to Planetary Habitation: A PubMed-Based Historical Mapping Review of Aerospace Nursing (1946-2025).

Kazumi Kubota, Satoko Tsuda, Anna Kubota

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazumi KubotaResearch Organization, Shimonoseki City University, Shimonoseki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-2313
Satoko TsudaCollege of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0165-6741
Anna KubotaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civilian spaceflight and long-duration missions are expanding, creating a need for nursing frameworks that extend beyond survival-focused transport care toward habitation-oriented support. This PubMed-based historical mapping review traced the evolution of aerospace nursing across 1946-2025 and examined how clinical priorities, target populations, and theoretical lenses have shifted over time. A focused PubMed search retrieved 208 records (last searched December 30, 2025). Title and abstract screening excluded clearly non-relevant records (n = 12); no full-text records were excluded. The remaining 196 records were synthesized using thematic and chronological mapping and summarized in an evolutionary matrix. Four phases were identified: Origins (1946-1970s), centered on aeromedical evacuation and survival during transport; Professionalization (1980s-1990s), emphasizing provider well-being and the emergence of nursing theory in space contexts; Clinical Adaptation (2000s-2010s), focusing on procedural adaptation, training, and safety practices in altered gravity; and the New Frontier (2020s-2025), addressing civilian participation and competencies for long-duration missions. Across eight decades, the field shifted from guarding survival to facilitating habitation. Persistent gaps include everyday living support, life-course and reproductive care, and chronic disease management in altered gravity, with implications for workforce development and policy.

Indexed as

Aerospace MedicineSpace FlightHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansaeromedical evacuationaerospace nursingcommercial spaceflighthistorical mapping reviewmicrogravitynursing theoryspace nursingworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID41911476
PMCPMC13035310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.