ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Impact of announced wait time information on emergency department overcrowding mitigation: a simulation study.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite widespread implementation of predicted patient wait time information systems in hospital emergency departments (EDs), the relationship between quality of announced wait time information and ED overcrowding mitigation remains unclear. This study investigates how prediction accuracy, update frequency, and patient adoption rates affect ED overcrowding level. MATERIALS AND
methodsA data-calibrated simulation model was developed using patient visit records from three metropolitan EDs in Hong Kong. We systematically varied patient adoption rates and evaluated seven wait time prediction methods across four update frequencies. Key performance metrics included the mean and standard deviation of patient wait times and percentage of patients left without being seen (LWBS rate).
resultsAccurate prediction methods combined with frequent updates significantly reduced the mean and standard deviation of patient wait times and LWBS rate as patient adoption rate increased. Conversely, inaccurate prediction methods exhibited a U-shaped performance curve. Specifically, when the patient adoption rate was sufficiently high, these methods significantly increased the mean and standard deviation of wait times and LWBS rate, compared to the case with no predicted wait time.
conclusionsImplementing information systems to display predicted patient wait times requires carefully balancing prediction accuracy, update frequency, and patient adoption. Accurate and timely updates can help redistribute patient load across hospital networks and improve efficiency, while poor accuracy or infrequent updates risk worsening ED congestion, especially when patient adoption rate is high. Our study calls for immediate attention from ED managers to carefully evaluate the impact of announced wait time system before wide implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.