ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Use, Utility, and User Experience of Cloud-Based Medical Imaging in Pulmonary Nodule Care in China: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The detection of pulmonary nodules (PNs) has increased with the use of low-dose computed tomography screening. Effective management requires timely longitudinal surveillance and reliable comparison with prior examinations, yet access to previous imaging across institutions is often fragmented, leading to delays and potentially unnecessary repeat scans and costs. Cloud-based medical imaging (CMI) solutions offer a potential means of improving access and facilitating cross-institutional data exchange. However, the adoption and utility of CMI in PN care, especially in China, remain underexplored. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the possession, use, and impact of CMI on health care utilization, patient knowledge, and financial burden, as well as to identify usability and interoperability barriers through qualitative investigation. Methods: A mixed methods cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2022 to May 2024. The study involved 701 patients with PNs who completed structured surveys, and 20 participants (10 patients and 10 physicians) were interviewed. CMI use was defined as self-reported ability to view radiological images on a mobile device. We compared CMI users and nonusers and estimated adjusted odds ratios using multivariable logistic regression, then applied 1:1 propensity score matching to examine associations between CMI use and health care utilization, costs, and patient perceptions, and qualitative interviews were analyzed for usability themes. Results: The study found that 611 (87.2%) out of 701 patients had obtained CMI, with 404 (57.6%) out of 701 patients actively using it. In multivariable analysis, older age was independently associated with lower CMI use (odds ratios 0.985, 95% CI 0.972-0.999). After 1:1 propensity score matching, CMI users accessed more internet hospitals, consulted more physicians, and reported lower health care costs compared to nonusers. Users also demonstrated higher disease knowledge. Qualitative data identified key barriers, including poor system usability, limited retention time for images, and weak interoperability. CMI was perceived as beneficial for patient convenience and clinical efficiency, though concerns over image quality and system fragmentation were prevalent. Conclusions: While CMI is widely available, its usage remains suboptimal. Increased use is associated with enhanced health care engagement and reduced costs, suggesting that improving system usability and ensuring consistent access to imaging may help realize potential benefits of CMI. Future improvements should focus on ensuring long-term access, better retention protocols, and overcoming interoperability issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.