Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911336›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2026

Instructor Talk and Student Belonging in Introductory Biology: Not all Talk Matters and Relationships Vary by Student Identity.

Benjamin D Jackson, Bryn H Robinson, Matthew J Madison, Tessa C Andrews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin D JacksonDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
Bryn H RobinsonDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
Matthew J MadisonDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
Tessa C AndrewsDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What instructors say during class-beyond content-has promise for supporting students' perceptions that they are supported, connected, and valued in the classroom, which in turn predict positive outcomes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. We studied noncontent Instructor Talk used by 56 introductory biology instructors around the United States and how it related to sense of belonging among over 4900 students in their courses. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we identified positive relationships between some-but not all-categories of Instructor Talk and belonging among students. Instructor talk aimed at building relationships with students and explaining pedagogical choices had positive relationships with students' sense of connectedness to peers (for both) and comfort seeking instructor help (for the former), but not their comfort sharing ideas with the class. Using effect coding, we probed whether these relationships differed for students with 14 intersectional identities, including men and women from seven racial and ethnic groups. Relationships between Instructor Talk categories and components of belonging varied in their direction and magnitude for students with different intersectional identities. Findings demonstrate that even simple instructor actions-particularly language-may be meaningful to students, but we cannot assume that all students experience these actions the same way.

Indexed as

BiologyCommunicationFacultyStudentsFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupSocial Group

Identifiers

PMID41911336
PMCPMC13055020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.